Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GWer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article GWer listed on WP:VFD May 1 to May 7 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

Seems to be an irrelevant partisan invention of a Bush hater. Get-back-world-respect 17:52, 1 May 2004 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Redirect to Bushism -- Cyrius|&#9998 18:56, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete outright. Someone came up with a mildly-cute bit of wordplay and had nowhere better to display it. If it wasn't the article author, he/she's not far from the original source. TB 22:45, 1 May 2004 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Yup. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 23:32, 1 May 2004 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. Only relevant Google hit is to the Wikipedia article. I don't even like it much. How is it supposed to be pronounced? Gee-double-you-er? Gee-doubler? Not felicitious, not funny, and (the only important thing) no evidence of significant use. Dpbsmith 01:19, 2 May 2004 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Hey, if you come up with a new term and you want it to catch on, you have to try posting it somewhere. It was not meant to be funny.
  • Delete. --Samuel J. Howard 02:47, 2 May 2004 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. Lame private joke. Alcarillo 15:25, 3 May 2004 (UTC)Reply[reply]

End discussion